The eonic effect: a design argument that needs ‘atheism’?…//Stephen Meyer: The Evidence “Cries Out” for God, Not the Other Way Around | Evolution News

The ID group has so terrified Darwinists that they have battened down the hatches around fake science to ‘disprove’ the issue of design. Richard Dawkins with chattering teeth has pronounced natural selection the answer to design. But the issue of design never works as a proof for the existence of god, for a simple reason that the god idea is incoherent. And figures like Kant long ago exposed such logic. The problem appears step one with the term ‘intelligent’. Can we predicate design as ‘intelligent’ to conclude the existence of god? Can we call ‘god’ intelligent. Think carefully the idea is a trap.
Consider the absurdities latent in our terminologies with a slightly different example: If Gautama was enlightened isn’t an omnipotent ‘god’ enlightened? If buddhas then pass beyond existence, does god then pass beyond existence? The idea creates hopeless confusion and shows how only a primitive theism can ascribe personhood and consciousness to ‘god’. The same would be true of ‘intelligent’, no doubt. When we mix different and distinct terminologies the results are garbage in garbage…
In fact we no language or concepts to even discuss the question beyond the idiot level of Christian theology. And design arguments at that level fail at the start. But design in nature is a perfectly good concept and can be considered without theological implications. It suddenly becomes, if not fully coherent, then at least a question for science to explore.

I have heard ID dismissed as “apologetics,” with the implication of proponents in search of evidence to support a conclusion to which they’re pre-committed.

Source: Stephen Meyer: The Evidence “Cries Out” for God, Not the Other Way Around | Evolution News

The eonic effect, world history, racism, slavery and the modern transition. – 1848+: The End(s) of History

The eonic effect is too much to take in all at once and needs a study plan and reading. The opinion here of academics et al who preside over the regime of Darwinism is not relevant. Break away from…

Source: The eonic effect, world history, racism, slavery and the modern transition. – 1848+: The End(s) of History

 The eonic effect shows at once the problem with darwinism – 1848+: The End(s) of History

The eonic effect has a hard time in the current so-called science culture. Darwinism reigns, but is it science? In fact it violates the basic tenet of science. We never observe evolution: it a larg…

Source:  The eonic effect shows at once the problem with darwinism – 1848+: The End(s) of History

The idea that evolution occurs via natural selection and survival of the fittest is laughable,…

The imposition of the Darwin paradigm is a grim reminder of the ideological hypnosis of an ambiguous era of science. Look at the eonic effect: almost everything of value in world history is generat…

Source: The idea that evolution occurs via natural selection and survival of the fittest is laughable, if not tragic, like everything else with homo ‘sapiens’, evolutionary theory is a screw up – 1848+: The End(s) of History

Evolutionary Dispute: Most Human Origins Stories Are Not Compatible With Known Fossils

Fossil apes can inform us about essential aspects of ape and human evolution, including the nature of our last common ancestor. In the 150 years since Charles Darwin speculated that humans originated in Africa, the number of species in the human family tree has exploded, but so has the level of d

Source: Evolutionary Dispute: Most Human Origins Stories Are Not Compatible With Known Fossils