That evolutionary scientists are materialists seems to be belied by the way some of them write.
Why do so many in the climate movement invoke climate science to demand a target of 350 ppm carbon in the atmosphere—and then turn around and support legislation and candidates that fall far short of that demand?
Years ago, tobacco companies discovered the link between their products and lung cancer. Did they warn their customers? No — they denied the link entirely.
Source: Climate Change was No Accident
This is grim addditional evidence of the inherent social darwinism of darwinism itself. If natural selection is false as a mechanization the whole idea collapses.
A look at the eonic effect shows the way equalization is an aspect of macroevolution, in history.
The “evolutionary” view (Darwinism, in fact) is often portrayed as a sort of liberation but people may be rather surprised to discover exactly what that liberation is.
The strangest aspect of darwinism is the tenacity of the ‘experts’ in promoting it ad infinitum even as dissent emerges in the background, essentially falsifying the theory.