We were critical of new age figures like gurdjieff today. If we get sentimental about xtian pieties about the real gospel we might do well to consider the implications of such figures: we can’t assume anything about xtianity from the gospel.
Continue reading Evangelicals and sundry ‘devils’ like rogue sufis and black magical (xtian) gurdjieffs
We lack a true secular movement that can challenge the xtian monolith, now we suspect in its last phase of degenerating putridity. One problem here is the reformation emerged from a similar ‘commercial’ vice in the sale of indulgences and then become somehow reinfected via the calvinist sleight of hand about capitalism. We should aggressively remind xtians, however that with munzer the idea of communism in a christian context was born: so there is a very strong element of challenge to xtian capitalism in an endgame of the reformation. Continue reading reformation endgame…//Disgusted Evangelical Scholar Details How Christian ‘Grifters and Status-Seekers’ Paved the Way for Trump | Alternet
Elbaum wrote Revolution in the Air in 2001 to reclaim the lessons of the new communist movement for contemporary militants who, like their early sixties’ predecessors, became activists when the radical left was fragmented and weak. How relevant is this history and the lessons he draws for us now, in this new period of left upsurge?
Although a neo-communist with a novel platform i feel ‘solidarity’ only up to a point with the marxist to NCM historical line. My verdict on this history is: dreary, good bye to all that. Continue reading up in the air: grounding neo-communism…//Lessons from One Left to the Next: Revolution in the Air Reissued
A ‘dialectic’ of revolution/virtual revolution
February 13th, 2018
We have almost deliberately indulged a kind of ‘dialectic’ of revolution/virtual revolution, the latter a way station as we confront the immensely dangerous and conflicted theme of revolutionary action. Continue reading A ‘dialectic’ of revolution/virtual revolution
Falling between two stools: religious and secular confusion over history
February 11th, 2018
Marxists often don’t get it: you can’t propose an incorrect theory of history and expect people to listen. The confusion over ‘theory’ endangers their profound framework of insights, taken empirically, as a critique of the capitalist era.
Using the eonic model we can show just how hard it is to grapple with a real theory of history. From there we can stand back and distance ourselves from the syndrome of false certainties and we can also reconcile, or at least defang,the collision of secular and religious historicisms…
archive: R48G: the eonic effect: as a tool to ‘debrief’ historical theories… Continue reading Models of history
This is a quick overview that will be expanded later. What are we up to here?
Darwiniana is somewhat disorienting at times but has a set of core perspectives: it is one of the oldest blogs and started in 2005 as a platform examining critically the legacy of darwinism and the confusions of its theoretical model. Continue reading Darwiniana: blog history, mission statement, themes/memes: a quick overview