Why doesn’t Professor Behe go along with famed Evangelical Christian scientist Francis Collins, and others?
Source: Q&A with Michael Behe: What’s Wrong with Theistic Evolution? | Evolution News
Tag: Behe
Polar Bear Seminar: New Evidence That Michael Behe Is Right | Evolution News
Many studies show that degradative mutations in APOB cause decreased cholesterol.
Source: Polar Bear Seminar: New Evidence That Michael Behe Is Right | Evolution News
Behe on Darwinism’s “Socially Inherited Dependence on Classical Yet Irrelevant Math” | Evolution News
Professor Behe traces the errant thinking to an outdated mathematical picture taken from Ronald Fisher and his 1930 book, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.
Michael Behe responds to the hit pre-publication review at Science | Uncommon Descent
The fact that the attack is incompetent is its strength, not its weakness. It shows the social power of Darwinism, irrespective of intellectual force. Most Science readers will probably go with social power. It gives them the right to sneer, right or wrong.
Source: Michael Behe responds to the hit pre-publication review at Science | Uncommon Descent
Some thoughts on the hatchet review of Behe’s Darwin Devolves in Science | Uncommon Descent
One wonders, do many biologists have independent ideas that Darwinism stifles? If so, they must be frustrated by the need to keep them under wraps or defend them from malign mediocrities for whom mere orthodoxy produces a living.
Source: Some thoughts on the hatchet review of Behe’s Darwin Devolves in Science | Uncommon Descent
Science Mag’s hit on Michael Behe’s new book Darwin Devolves avoids his main point | Uncommon Descent
In American Association for the Advancement of Science’s magazine, Science, we read,In the grand scheme of evolution, mutations serve only to break structures and degrade functions, Behe argues. He allows that mutation and natural selection can explain species- and genus-level diversification, bu
Behe’s New Book, Darwin Devolves —
I recently had a lively conversation with a former colleague at the Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Cologne.
Source: Behe’s New Book, Darwin Devolves — Stunning and Absolutely Convincing | Evolution News
Michael Behe’s Darwin Devolves Topples Foundational Claim of Evolutionary Theory
I saw that biologist Nathan Lents says that he has been asked to review Mike Behe’s new book.
Source: Michael Behe’s Darwin Devolves Topples Foundational Claim of Evolutionary Theory | Evolution News
Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution Google Books
The groundbreaking, “seminal work” (Time) on intelligent design that dares to ask, was Darwin wrong? In 1996, Darwin’s Black Box helped to launch the intelligent design movement: the argument that nature exhibits evidence of design, beyond Darwinian randomness. It sparked a national debate on evolution, which continues to intensify across the country. From one end of the spectrum to the other, Darwin’s Black Box has established itself as the key intelligent design text — the one argument that must be addressed in order to determine whether Darwinian evolution is sufficient to explain life as we know it. In a major new Afterword for this edition, Behe explains that the complexity discovered by microbiologists has dramatically increased since the book was first published. That complexity is a continuing challenge to Darwinism, and evolutionists have had no success at explaining it. Darwin’s Black Box is more important today than ever.
Source: Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution – Michael J. Behe – Google Books
Darwiniana 