Behe on Darwinism’s “Socially Inherited Dependence on Classical Yet Irrelevant Math” | Evolution News

Professor Behe traces the errant thinking to an outdated mathematical picture taken from Ronald Fisher and his 1930 book, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.

Source: Behe on Darwinism’s “Socially Inherited Dependence on Classical Yet Irrelevant Math” | Evolution News

Michael Behe responds to the hit pre-publication review at Science | Uncommon Descent

The fact that the attack is incompetent is its strength, not its weakness. It shows the social power of Darwinism, irrespective of intellectual force. Most Science readers will probably go with social power. It gives them the right to sneer, right or wrong.

Source: Michael Behe responds to the hit pre-publication review at Science | Uncommon Descent

Some thoughts on the hatchet review of Behe’s Darwin Devolves in Science | Uncommon Descent

One wonders, do many biologists have independent ideas that Darwinism stifles? If so, they must be frustrated by the need to keep them under wraps or defend them from malign mediocrities for whom mere orthodoxy produces a living.

Source: Some thoughts on the hatchet review of Behe’s Darwin Devolves in Science | Uncommon Descent

Science Mag’s hit on Michael Behe’s new book Darwin Devolves avoids his main point | Uncommon Descent

In American Association for the Advancement of Science’s magazine, Science, we read,In the grand scheme of evolution, mutations serve only to break structures and degrade functions, Behe argues. He allows that mutation and natural selection can explain species- and genus-level diversification, bu

Source: Science Mag’s hit on Michael Behe’s new book Darwin Devolves avoids his main point | Uncommon Descent