Coyne, Bechly, Miller, Berlinski: Scientists Debate David Gelernter’s Darwin Apostasy 

If anyone is worrying, it is Coyne and his fellow Darwinists, alarmed at the defection of a stellar intellect like Gelernter.

Source: Coyne, Bechly, Miller, Berlinski: Scientists Debate David Gelernter’s Darwin Apostasy | Evolution News

Straw in the wind? Darwin’s random variation is discredited in a recent paper 

They propose “nonrandom variation”. Later: “Darwin’s idea that variation is generated randomly has largely been taken for granted rather than tested, representing a fundamental gap in our understanding of evolution.”

Source: Straw in the wind? Darwin’s random variation is discredited in a recent paper | Uncommon Descent

Another think tank now openly questions Darwinism 

Here’s a summary of Turner’s views: “I can remember the day it happened: I could no longer be a Darwinist.” Hoover and Power Line are conservative outlets, yes. But there was a time when they would hesitate to get involved with criticizing Darwin, for fear of boarding Noah’s Ark. But Darwinism is j

Source: Another think tank now openly questions Darwinism | Uncommon Descent

Total Darwin Rewrite in progress: “Survival of the fittest” now means “sympathy” | Uncommon Descent

Funny how so many people, whether they agreed with Darwin or not, got it so wrong all these years … How did it get to be called “social Darwinism” anyway, as opposed to, say, “social Florence Nightingale-ism”?

Source: Total Darwin Rewrite in progress: “Survival of the fittest” now means “sympathy” | Uncommon Descent